[TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7919 (4908)

2017-01-15 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7919, "Negotiated Finite Field Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral Parameters for Transport Layer Security (TLS)". -- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7919&eid=490

Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7919 (4908)

2017-01-15 Thread Martin Thomson
For those interested in the guts, this came up when discussing https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1330618 where Hubert noted that NSS is not compliant with this requirement. On 16 January 2017 at 13:51, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC791

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis-11.txt

2017-01-15 Thread Sean Turner
Please have a look at -10 and -11 because I believe -11 addresses all known issues except the context issue, which we are waiting on input from the CFRG on. spt > On Jan 12, 2017, at 01:13, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts

Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7919 (4908)

2017-01-15 Thread Stephen Farrell
On instruction from the WG chairs, or by acclamation, I will approve this erratum. Silence OTOH means inaction:-) S On 16/01/17 01:00, Martin Thomson wrote: > For those interested in the guts, this came up when discussing > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1330618 where Hubert > note

Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7919 (4908)

2017-01-15 Thread Eric Rescorla
I am in favor of this erratum, or rather of correcting it On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > On instruction from the WG chairs, or by acclamation, I will > approve this erratum. Silence OTOH means inaction:-) > > S > > On 16/01/17 01:00, Martin Thomson wrote: > > For tho