On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 02:45:53PM -0800, Adam Langley wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> >> >> As an individual, I'd be in favour of this change but reading
> >> >> over [1], section 5, I wondered if we'd analysed the effects of
> >> >> 0rtt/replayable-data with tha
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Stephen Farrell
wrote:
>
>
> On 29/12/16 18:38, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Stephen Farrell <
> stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie
> >> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hiya,
> >>
> >> On 29/12/16 17:37, Adam Langley wrote:
> >>> https://github.com/tlswg
Hiya,
On 29/12/16 19:08, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Stephen Farrell > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 29/12/16 18:38, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Stephen Farrell <
>> stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie
wrote:
>>>
Hiya,
On 29/12/16
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Stephen Farrell
wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> On 29/12/16 19:08, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Stephen Farrell <
> stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie
> >> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 29/12/16 18:38, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10
On 30/12/16 16:14, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Stephen Farrell
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hiya,
>>
>> On 29/12/16 19:08, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Stephen Farrell <
>> stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie
wrote:
>>>
On 29/12/16 18:38,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 08:14:57AM -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Stephen Farrell
> wrote:
> >
> > What I'm wondering is if we're maybe missing a server-side check
> > on that, with the possible attempted attack of a 0rtt replay in
> > mind. E.g. a MUST check for th
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Ilari Liusvaara
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 08:14:57AM -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Stephen Farrell <
> stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > What I'm wondering is if we're maybe missing a server-side check
> >
On 12/30/16 at 8:17 AM, stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie (Stephen Farrell) wrote:
> Fair enough. I didn't read enough text to get that clearly
> I guess, which is my fault:-)
If you didn't read enough, is this a mistake that implementer's are likely to
make?
Cheers - Bill
On 30/12/16 19:41, Bill Frantz wrote:
> On 12/30/16 at 8:17 AM, stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie (Stephen Farrell) wrote:
>
>> Fair enough. I didn't read enough text to get that clearly
>> I guess, which is my fault:-)
>
> If you didn't read enough, is this a mistake that implementer's are likely to
