Hi IIari,
>From all of the RFCs about suite B that I have read, DSA has never been a part
>of it.
RSA can be used for signatures and key wrap/transport.
Quynh.
From: TLS on behalf of Ilari Liusvaara
Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 1:49 PM
To: Sal
Hiya,
On 04/09/15 01:58, Sean Turner wrote:
> Also, I wouldn’t get too wrapped around the updates header because
> the meaning has changed over time. At some points it has been used
> to point implementers at other related RFCs, but what I think the
> IESG has settled onto now (Stephen correct m
Oops - s/NTP/NNTP/g below:-)
And since there's no active NNTP wg, I guess asking on some
relevant list(s) is the thing to do. If folks there think that
a short RFC to just fix this is useful then feel free to
get back to me and we can figure how best to progress that.
Cheers,
S.
On 04/09/15 12:
In Section 7.1, the document says:
4. finished_secret = HKDF-Expand-Label(xSS,
"finished secret",
handshake_hash, L)
5. resumption_secret = HKDF-Expand-Label(master_secret,
See:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg17184.html
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
> In Section 7.1, the document says:
>
> 4. finished_secret = HKDF-Expand-Label(xSS,
> "finished secret",
>
Eric:
I looked at Hugo's message in the context of the table in Section 7.1:
Key ExchangeStatic Secret (SS)Ephemeral Secret (ES)
---
(EC)DHE Client ephemeral Client ephemeral
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
> Eric:
>
> I looked at Hugo's message in the context of the table in Section 7.1:
>
> Key ExchangeStatic Secret (SS)Ephemeral Secret (ES)
> ---
> (EC
