Hi all,
Op do 27 jul 2023 om 21:31 schreef Sean Turner :
>
> * Update on post-quantum signatures (from NIST): NIST is running another
> round of their competition because there aren't any good, performant and
> small, signature algorithms yet. Many of the algorithms have already
> fallen. We wil
Will probably turn up anyway in the draft status section
but last time a couple of people said they hoped to be
able to report on ECH experimentation in roughly this
timeframe, so be great if someone could pull together a
short slot with that info (if it's ready).
Cheers,
S.
On 17/07/2023 17:22
I wonder whether there are any new insights regarding sslkeylogfile
standardization. I know we didn't make much progress last time we asked, but
it seems like the discussion moved on a little in the time since then.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023, at 09:22, Sean Turner wrote:
> And another gentle reminde
And another gentle reminder.
Cheers,
spt
> On Jul 11, 2023, at 10:42, Sean Turner wrote:
>
> Now that the submission deadline has passed … here’s a gentle reminder!
>
> Cheers,
> spt
>
>> On Jun 18, 2023, at 19:25, Sean Turner wrote:
>>
>> The TLS WG is planning to meet at IETF 117. A 2 hou
Now that the submission deadline has passed … here’s a gentle reminder!
Cheers,
spt
> On Jun 18, 2023, at 19:25, Sean Turner wrote:
>
> The TLS WG is planning to meet at IETF 117. A 2 hour slot has been requested,
> but not yet scheduled. The chairs would like to solicit input from the WG for
