Re: [TLS] extended headers for (D)TLS (and their use with connection-id)

2018-01-24 Thread Adam Langley
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB/Cambridge, UK) wrote: > Do you think this is likely to cause havoc? Or, in your experience, > middle-boxes tend to not interfere after the TLS channel is up? I expect so. There was a move, early in TLS 1.3, to drop the superfluous vers

Re: [TLS] extended headers for (D)TLS (and their use with connection-id)

2018-01-24 Thread Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB/Cambridge, UK)
On 24/01/2018, 15:53, "alang...@gmail.com on behalf of Adam Langley" wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 6:31 AM, Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - > GB/Cambridge, UK) wrote: > > > > A few months ago, Nikos (can't remember if on this list or on a side > > conversation) came up with this thought of a generic

Re: [TLS] extended headers for (D)TLS (and their use with connection-id)

2018-01-24 Thread Adam Langley
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 6:31 AM, Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB/Cambridge, UK) wrote: > > A few months ago, Nikos (can't remember if on this list or on a side > conversation) came up with this thought of a generic way to extend the > TLS/DTLS record header. So, I've stolen his idea and written it up