Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-02.txt

>TLSTM was the name given to it by RFC 6353 and does provide the full context >(i.e. a transport model), so I am hesitant to change that part, but I don't >see any problem with calling it SNMP-TLSTM registry. I will make that change >in the next version. Works for me, thank you. ___

Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-02.txt

TLSTM was the name given to it by RFC 6353 and does provide the full context (i.e. a transport model), so I am hesitant to change that part, but I don't see any problem with calling it SNMP-TLSTM registry. I will make that change in the next version. Regards, Ken Vaughn Trevilon LLC 6606 FM 14

Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-02.txt

Thanks for the heads-up. I think TLSTM is confusing, could it perhaps be SNMPTLS or something similar? I understand “prior art.” At a minimum, the new IANA registry needs to be renamed. ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/l