On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 6:25 AM Salz, Rich wrote:
> >It is probably "best" (for some definition of "best") to publish an
> RFC
> that Updates: 9102 and has the revised directive to IANA.
>
> I hope that is excessive.
>
> >Probably an errata report should be filed against RFC 9102 rega
>It is probably "best" (for some definition of "best") to publish an RFC
that Updates: 9102 and has the revised directive to IANA.
I hope that is excessive.
>Probably an errata report should be filed against RFC 9102 regardless.
IANA might be able to use the errata report without
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 8:39 PM Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 08:27:02PM -0500, Shumon Huque wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:29 AM Ilari Liusvaara <
> ilariliusva...@welho.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I noticed that the "dnssec_chain" extension in the IANA registry lists
> > >
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 08:27:02PM -0500, Shumon Huque wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:29 AM Ilari Liusvaara
> wrote:
>
> > I noticed that the "dnssec_chain" extension in the IANA registry lists
> > only "CH" in the "TLS 1.3" column. However, the extension sends its
> > response in the certifi
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:29 AM Ilari Liusvaara
wrote:
> I noticed that the "dnssec_chain" extension in the IANA registry lists
> only "CH" in the "TLS 1.3" column. However, the extension sends its
> response in the certificate message (section 2.2), so I think that
> column should read "CH, CT".
