The call for adoption is now over. The conclusion is that there is
lack of clarity around the goals of this document. Thus, it will not
be adopted as a WG item at this time. We encourage more discussions
and reviews of this document and its open issues, and ask the authors
to clarify its goals befo
On Thu, 2018-07-26 at 15:05 -0700, Christopher Wood wrote:
> The sense of the TLS@IETF102 room was that the WG should adopt
> draft-housley-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk as a WG item. This email
> is to confirm this sense on list. If you would like for this draft to
> become a WG document and you
My recollection is that we would do a call for adoption, and that would lead to
comments, and then I post an update. If the comments are addressed adequately,
then the update will be adopted, otherwise not.
Russ
> On Jul 26, 2018, at 8:16 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>
> I think that we need a
I think that we need a little more clarity on the goals before we talk
about adoption for this. I'm sorry if that message wasn't clear at
the meeting.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 8:06 AM Christopher Wood
wrote:
>
> The sense of the TLS@IETF102 room was that the WG should adopt
> draft-housley-tls-tls
