On 24 July 2016 at 13:26, Ilari Liusvaara wrote:
> The legacy type of RSA-PSS is RSA, right?
If I understand you correctly, then yes. When (if) the proposed
revamp goes ahead, we will have to qualify this with the note that
this can only be used with TLS_*_RSA_... We should probably say
somethi
Actually, I just realized that I should do this anyway.
On 24 July 2016 at 22:33, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 24 July 2016 at 13:26, Ilari Liusvaara wrote:
>> The legacy type of RSA-PSS is RSA, right?
>
> If I understand you correctly, then yes. When (if) the proposed
> revamp goes ahead, we wil
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 11:45:48AM +0200, Martin Thomson wrote:
> David Benjamin noted that we really need to decide whether PSS was
> something that we should have supported in TLS 1.2. We can't have a
> situation where there are two implementations of 1.3 that for some
> reason have 1.3 disabled
I am in favor of this change. We should be trying to move to PSS in general
and there's no reason why 1.3 clients which support PSS can't also support
it for 1.2
-Ekr
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Martin Thomson
wrote:
> David Benjamin noted that we really need to decide whether PSS was
>
