On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 at 19:49, David Benjamin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:46 AM Cory Benfield wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 23:38, David Benjamin wrote:
>> > To clarify, are you unconvinced that ALPS is easier than leaving H2 alone,
>> > or that ALPS is easier than solving this prob
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:46 AM Cory Benfield wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 23:38, David Benjamin
> wrote:
> > To clarify, are you unconvinced that ALPS is easier than leaving H2
> alone, or that ALPS is easier than solving this problem with half-RTT? The
> document’s aim is the latter. Your co
Oh, and I should say this out loud: my attitude to ALPS has softened
in the past two months or so. I definitely don't want my comments to
be perceived as being in opposition to the adoption of new work by
this WG: I just want to flesh out exactly what problems we're trying
to solve, so that we can
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 23:38, David Benjamin wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> Thanks all for the feedback. I’ve tried to address it below, but there's a
> lot of text, so please let me know if I’ve missed or misunderstood any of
> your points.
>
>
> Cory commented on SETTINGS_[HQ]PACK_ENABLE_STATIC_TABL
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021, at 10:38, David Benjamin wrote:
> How does NSS expose the late client authentication to the application?
> I thought NSS didn't support half-RTT at all when the server requests
> client certificates, but perhaps I misunderstood.
There are three states we use with respect to
Hi all,
Thanks all for the feedback. I’ve tried to address it below, but there's a
lot of text, so please let me know if I’ve missed or misunderstood any of
your points.
Cory commented on SETTINGS_[HQ]PACK_ENABLE_STATIC_TABLES in
draft-vvv-httpbis-alps-00. I agree that is odd. We’ve uploaded a dr
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 10:16, Cory Benfield wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 03:44, Victor Vasiliev wrote:
> >
> > Hi Cory,
> >
> > I am not sure there is a big difference between ALPN and ALPS in that
> > regard. ALPS is (or at least can be implemented as) "essentially a static
> > byte sequ
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 03:44, Victor Vasiliev wrote:
>
> Hi Cory,
>
> I am not sure there is a big difference between ALPN and ALPS in that regard.
> ALPS is (or at least can be implemented as) "essentially a static byte
> sequence vended by the application layer protocol". Furthermore,
> app
Hi David,
Thanks for writing this up. I think that it helped clarify things a little in
my mind.
I had been separately thinking about the problem and did reach a conclusion. I
just needed time to write a response.
I think that there are two things you might want to separate here: what might
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 21:56, David Benjamin wrote:
>
> Hi TLS and HTTP friends,
>
> At the last HTTPWG interim, there was a question of why one would want
> something like ALPS (draft-vvv-tls-alps) for HTTP SETTINGS
> (draft-vvv-httpbis-alps) over TLS 1.3 half-RTT data. I know we've also had
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
