Re: [TLS] 3rd WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-tls13

2018-01-15 Thread Tim Jackson
gt; Date: Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 2:42:04 PM To: "Eric Rescorla" mailto:e...@rtfm.com>> Cc: "" mailto:tls@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [TLS] 3rd WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-tls13 Thanks for the abundant generosity of patience, but I didn't mean that I wanted to add a n

Re: [TLS] 3rd WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-tls13

2018-01-14 Thread Colm MacCárthaigh
Thanks for the abundant generosity of patience, but I didn't mean that I wanted to add a note to the text of the I-D, there's been enough delay and I'm excited to see this progress. I just meant "add a note" in my e-mail ;-) Though I do like your terse note, it's right to the point. On Sun, Jan 14

Re: [TLS] 3rd WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-tls13

2018-01-14 Thread Eric Rescorla
Hi Colm, Thanks for your note. This seems straightforward to handle before IETF-LC. Maybe something like: "Note: many application layer protocols implicitly assume that replays are handled at lower levels. Tailure to observe these precautions may exposes your application to serious risks which ar

Re: [TLS] 3rd WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-tls13

2018-01-14 Thread Colm MacCárthaigh
Back during the previous last call, I felt really guilty about bringing up the 0-RTT stuff so late. Even though it turned out that middle boxes turned out to be a bigger problem to deal with anyway, I just want to say that I'm really grateful for the 0-RTT related changes in the document and for th

Re: [TLS] 3rd WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-tls13

2018-01-14 Thread Tony Arcieri
Ship it -- Tony Arcieri ___ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls