Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7301 (5176)

2017-11-02 Thread Sean Turner
yep > On Nov 2, 2017, at 10:45, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > It's Expert Review with the requirement being a stable reference. > > -Ekr > > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Salz, Rich wrote: > > ➢ Maybe you should start by sending an email to the working group, > explaining why you thi

Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7301 (5176)

2017-11-02 Thread Eric Rescorla
It's Expert Review with the requirement being a stable reference. -Ekr On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Salz, Rich wrote: > > ➢ Maybe you should start by sending an email to the working group, > explaining why you think that this is necessary. Because the way to > change these thin

Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7301 (5176)

2017-11-02 Thread Salz, Rich
➢ Maybe you should start by sending an email to the working group, explaining why you think that this is necessary. Because the way to change these things ultimately is to publish an RFC. Well, someone might have to write an RFC. I forget details of how this registry was set u

Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7301 (5176)

2017-11-02 Thread Eric Rescorla
See: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7301#section-6 " This registry operates under the "Expert Review" policy as defined in [RFC5226 ]. The designated expert is advised to encourage the inclusion of a reference to a permanent and readily available speci

Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7301 (5176)

2017-11-01 Thread Martin Thomson
Maybe you should start by sending an email to the working group, explaining why you think that this is necessary. Because the way to change these things ultimately is to publish an RFC. On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Ilya Grigorik wrote: > Wasn't sure what the appropriate route is.. apologies f

Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7301 (5176)

2017-11-01 Thread Ilya Grigorik
Wasn't sure what the appropriate route is.. apologies for the noise. :-) Should I file a bug against http-wg ? On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > I don't think that this is an appropriate way to request the addition > of

Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7301 (5176)

2017-11-01 Thread Martin Thomson
I don't think that this is an appropriate way to request the addition of ALPN labels. If it is important to register ALPN labels for these protocols, then the HTTP working group can produce a short document defining them. On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:24 PM, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following e