Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6127)

2020-05-01 Thread William Whyte
-Original Message- From: TLS On Behalf Of Peter Wu Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 7:07 AM To: RFC Errata System Cc: r...@cert.org; sean+i...@sn3rd.com; ka...@mit.edu; tls@ietf.org Subject: [EXT] Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6127) How could this affect the readers comprehensio

Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6127)

2020-05-01 Thread Peter Wu
How could this affect the readers comprehension? This is not an editorial issue in as defined at https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/ >From the context it is often clear what "abort" or "terminate" means. An enumeration of the first occurrences in the document: - "A failure of the hand

Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6127)

2020-05-01 Thread Peter Wu
The current section describes what a client should do when it faces a HRR, and the referenced bullet point specifies how the HRR "key_share" extension should be processed. The errata suggests "clarifying" that point by adding: > Note: A "key_share" extension may not be supplied in a > HelloRetryR