Re: [TLS] (bonus) AD review draft-ietf-tls-subcerts

2022-05-17 Thread Sean Turner
Paul, Nick spun a new version. I believe the ball is back in your court. Cheers, spt Sent from my iPhone > On May 11, 2022, at 21:23, Paul Wouters > wrote: > >  > >> On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 1:08 PM Nick Sullivan wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> Thank you for the review. I've put up a PR to addre

Re: [TLS] (bonus) AD review draft-ietf-tls-subcerts

2022-05-17 Thread Nick Sullivan
Thanks, Paul. -13 is Submitted. Nick On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 9:22 PM Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 1:08 PM Nick Sullivan wrote: > >> Hi Paul, >> >> Thank you for the review. I've put up a PR to address your points: >> >> https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts/compare/nick/wout

Re: [TLS] (bonus) AD review draft-ietf-tls-subcerts

2022-05-11 Thread Paul Wouters
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 1:08 PM Nick Sullivan wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Thank you for the review. I've put up a PR to address your points: > > https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts/compare/nick/wouters-review-may22?expand=1 > > Comments inline. > Thanks for the changes and explanations. Looks good

Re: [TLS] (bonus) AD review draft-ietf-tls-subcerts

2022-05-11 Thread Nick Sullivan
Hi Paul, Thank you for the review. I've put up a PR to address your points: https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts/compare/nick/wouters-review-may22?expand=1 Comments inline. On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 9:03 PM Paul Wouters wrote: > > As this document already saw an AD review by Ben Kaduk, I will no