Daniel,
This I-D is an update to RFC 5246 (see header). Only the 7525 updates were
moved to 7525bis. While checking this out I did note a couple of there places
in the I-D that 7525 needs to be scrubbed. I asked for changes in the following
PR to account for those:
https://github.com/tlswg/dra
Looks good to me however this still represents in my opinion an update to
5246 -- which I think is also what we want.
Yours,
Daniel
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 10:37 PM Sean Turner wrote:
> Just a reminder that sometime tomorrow I will ask for these PRs to be
> merged and a new version of the I-D be
Just a reminder that sometime tomorrow I will ask for these PRs to be merged
and a new version of the I-D be produced so that we can make progress.
spt
> On Aug 27, 2021, at 10:58, Sean Turner wrote:
>
> Hi! While address the IoT Directorate comments from IETF LC, some addition
> comments hav
I read all the PR's and issues. They all look good to me.
Why does github do ".../pull/18" but ".../issues/12"? Why aren't they both
singular? This will keep me up at night but is out of scope of this draft.
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https:
Hi! While address the IoT Directorate comments from IETF LC, some addition
comments have been received. I would like to address these new comments and get
the I-D in the hands of the iESG. There were three set of comments:
1) Based on Daniels and David Benjamin’s reviews, the I-D is not as clear
