On 27 October 2016 at 16:41, Kazuho Oku wrote:
> So if we are going to align the ranges of the two arrays, it might
> make more sense to allow zero-length for both of them, instead of
> disallowing it.
I think that it would be better to have a minimum size here. Those
applications that don't wan
2016-10-27 14:30 GMT+09:00 Eric Rescorla :
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Kazuho Oku wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you for posting draft-18, and thank you for the simplification of
>> RMS.
>>
>> I have finished implementing resumption and early-data in picotls. The
>> effort started just be
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Kazuho Oku wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for posting draft-18, and thank you for the simplification of
> RMS.
>
> I have finished implementing resumption and early-data in picotls. The
> effort started just before draft-17 was published, so it would be fair
> to say
Hi,
Thank you for posting draft-18, and thank you for the simplification of RMS.
I have finished implementing resumption and early-data in picotls. The
effort started just before draft-17 was published, so it would be fair
to say that my effort is solely based on the up-to-date specification.
I
Folks,
I have just posted draft-ietf-tls-tls13-18.
The only wire format change from -17 is that I removed the extra key
derivation stage computing resumption_psk from RMS. This was a
holdover from when we also had a resumption context. Now PSK for
connection N+1 = RMS from connection N. Thanks to
