On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 8:29 AM Russ Housley wrote:
> What is going on with draft-ietf-tls-subcerts? A WG Last Call was held,
> and an issue was raised, but the document has not been updated since the WL
> Last Call closed about a year ago?
>
>
[Joe] Hi Russ, There is activity on the document [
What is going on with draft-ietf-tls-subcerts? A WG Last Call was held, and an
issue was raised, but the document has not been updated since the WL Last Call
closed about a year ago?
Russ
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/
Ya you're right here it is the DER-encoded SPKI and opaque
ASN.1_subjectPublicKeyInfo is the right way to go.
Thanks,
Subodh
From: TLS on behalf of Sean Turner
Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2018 11:34:17 AM
To: tls@ietf.org
Subject: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-sub
Hi,
I submitted a PR to address some nits I noticed:
https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts/pull/17
One question:
In s3, public_key is the same thing as RawPublicKey in RFC 7250, i.e., they are
both DER-encoded SPKI from RFC5280? If it is, does it make sense to reuse:
opaque ASN.1_subjectPublicK
