On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 3:39 AM Björn Haase wrote:
> Dear Rob,
>
> you might know that currently there is an ongoing PAKE selection process
> in the context of the CFRG working group. SRP is no longer considered there.
>
Well, that list is way over my head. Thank you for pointing it out, though.
, or an acceptance of a
contract offer unless explicitly and conspicuously designated or stated as such.
Von: TLS Im Auftrag von Rob Sayre
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. September 2019 01:05
An: tls@ietf.org
Betreff: [TLS] draft-barnes-tls-pake
Hello,
I read
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft
Hello,
I read https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-tls-pake-04.
I understand and agree that the SRP scheme in RFC 5054 might not apply
cleanly to TLS 1.3.
However, I don't understand the rationale for choosing other PAKE
algorithms for this draft over SRP. I found that Apple iCloud and HomeK
