On Sun, October 11, 2015 7:43 pm, Dave Garrett wrote:
> I'd like to get a sense of what the WG is willing to consider with regard
> to SHA-1, rather than only Viktor and myself discussing this. Basically, I
> see 3 options:
>
> Option 0: Do nothing new. SHA-1 is soft deprecated, but still a ful
I'd like to get a sense of what the WG is willing to consider with regard to
SHA-1, rather than only Viktor and myself discussing this. Basically, I see 3
options:
Option 0: Do nothing new. SHA-1 is soft deprecated, but still a fully viable
option in TLS 1.3 if nothing better is installed.
Opti
