Re: [TLS] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-tls13-26: (with COMMENT)

2018-03-08 Thread Martin Thomson
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 12:10 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: >> I wondered why >> >>Newer >>clients or servers, when communicating with newer peers, SHOULD >>negotiate the most preferred common parameters. >> >> was not a MUST. > > > Ugh, this is actually not even a normative statement, It's

Re: [TLS] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-tls13-26: (with COMMENT)

2018-03-08 Thread Sean Turner
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 08:10, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:25 PM, Spencer Dawkins > wrote: > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-tls-tls13-26: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to al

Re: [TLS] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-tls13-26: (with COMMENT)

2018-03-08 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:25 PM, Spencer Dawkins < spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-tls-tls13-26: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in th

[TLS] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-tls13-26: (with COMMENT)

2018-03-07 Thread Spencer Dawkins
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tls-tls13-26: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http