> On Jun 2, 2025, at 15:06, Thomas Fossati wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 11:52:28AM +0100, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> I'm fine with Rich's proposed change, but this is a normative change which
>> requires some sort of WG Consensus Call IMO.
>
> I agree.
Msg sent to confirm change!
spt
___
On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 11:52:28AM +0100, Eric Rescorla wrote:
I'm fine with Rich's proposed change, but this is a normative change which
requires some sort of WG Consensus Call IMO.
I agree.
___
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send a
I'm fine with Rich's proposed change, but this is a normative change which
requires some sort of WG Consensus Call IMO.
-Ekr
On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 11:48 AM Thomas Fossati
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This version addrssees Joe Clarke's OPSDIR review and Rich's request to
> move the RRC message type regis
Hi,
This version addrssees Joe Clarke's OPSDIR review and Rich's request to
move the RRC message type registry from Standars Action to Expert Review.
cheers, thanks!
On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 11:44:18AM +0100, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-tls-dtls-rrc-14.txt is now a
