,
John
From: TLS on behalf of Peter Gutmann
Date: Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 07:37
To: alex.sch...@gmx.de , tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Question regarding RFC 7366
alex.sch...@gmx.de writes:
>I would really appreciate a response to get some clarification on what the
>in
alex.sch...@gmx.de writes:
>I would really appreciate a response to get some clarification on what the
>intended interpretation is, i.e., when the extension should be used.
There's not really any contradiction, encrypt-then-MAC has nothing to do with
AEAD which is an all-in-one mode, so it doesn
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 01:18:22PM +0100, alex.sch...@gmx.de wrote:
> my question addresses the negotiation of the "encrypt_then_mac" extension
> proposed in RFC 7366 and, specifically, two possible interpretations of such
> negotiation when using AEAD ciphers.
I think the source of the confusion
Dear ladies and gentlemen,
my question addresses the negotiation of the "encrypt_then_mac" extension
proposed in RFC 7366 and, specifically, two possible interpretations of such
negotiation when using AEAD ciphers.
In summary, the client and server could interpret the negotiation of the
extensi
