Hi Eric and list,
I have updated the PR https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1098 last
week based on received feedback. Two issues are however still open:
- Should a different codepoint be used for SPKIs other than
rsaEncryption (i.e. id-RSASSA-PSS)? If so, what codepoints?
- Should cer
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:42:04AM +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 03:54 +, Peter Wu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > At the moment there is still ambiguity in the requirements for PSS
> > with
> > relation to certificates. Proposal to clarify this:
> > https://github.com/t
On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 13:15:58 CET Peter Wu wrote:
> Hi Nikos,
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:42:04AM +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 03:54 +, Peter Wu wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > At the moment there is still ambiguity in the requirements for PSS
> >
On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 12:15 +, Peter Wu wrote:
> Hi Nikos,
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:42:04AM +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 03:54 +, Peter Wu wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > At the moment there is still ambiguity in the requirements for
> > > PSS
> > >
Hi Nikos,
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:42:04AM +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 03:54 +, Peter Wu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > At the moment there is still ambiguity in the requirements for PSS
> > with
> > relation to certificates. Proposal to clarify this:
> > https://g
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 08:37:45PM -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> I don't think that this is the right answer.
>
> Let's separate out the question of (a) what people need to support and (b)
> what the code points mean. (b) needs to be unambigous, as that's the point
> of the extension and this PR a
On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 03:54 +, Peter Wu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the moment there is still ambiguity in the requirements for PSS
> with
> relation to certificates. Proposal to clarify this:
> https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1098
>
>
> This PR intends to clarify the requirements for PSS s
I don't think that this is the right answer.
Let's separate out the question of (a) what people need to support and (b)
what the code points mean. (b) needs to be unambigous, as that's the point
of the extension and this PR actually makes it explicitly unambigous.
With that said, there seem to be
Hi,
At the moment there is still ambiguity in the requirements for PSS with
relation to certificates. Proposal to clarify this:
https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1098
This PR intends to clarify the requirements for PSS support.
The requirements are intentionally minimal to reduce impleme
