The adoption call ended on Friday. There is support for adopting and working
on this draft as a WG item. Most of the support was received during the WG
session at IETF 106, but there was additional support provided on the list.
NOTE: Technically, we will formally adopt this draft once (i.e., pu
its nicely into the work on cTLS
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: TLS On Behalf Of Sean Turner
>> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2019 6:29 AM
>> To: TLS List >
>> Subject: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-semistatic-dh
>>
>> At IE
AM
> To: TLS List
> Subject: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-semistatic-dh
>
> At IETF 106 there was support for adoption of "Semi-Static Diffie-Hellman
> Key Establishment" for TLS 1.3 [0] as a WG item. To confirm this on the
> list: if you believe that the TLS
I am in favor of adopting this document as a starting point for further
work. It fits nicely into the work on cTLS
-Original Message-
From: TLS On Behalf Of Sean Turner
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2019 6:29 AM
To: TLS List
Subject: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-semistatic-dh
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019, 5:28 PM Sean Turner wrote:
> At IETF 106 there was support for adoption of "Semi-Static Diffie-Hellman
> Key Establishment" for TLS 1.3 [0] as a WG item. To confirm this on the
> list: if you believe that the TLS WG should not adopt this as a WG item,
> then please let the
At IETF 106 there was support for adoption of "Semi-Static Diffie-Hellman Key
Establishment" for TLS 1.3 [0] as a WG item. To confirm this on the list: if
you believe that the TLS WG should not adopt this as a WG item, then please let
the chairs know by posting a message to the TLS list by 2359
