I support this & will review DNS parts.
Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC
On 25.7.2018 04:16, Joseph Salowey wrote:
>
> The sense of the TLS@IETF102 room was the the WG should
> adopt https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-esni/
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draf
HOULD/MUST provide a way for the application to distinguish
>> it from the rest of the application data.
>
> First of these has to be MUST, or you get problems like I outlined
> earlier.
>
> And to implement checking for client only sending "safe" data
