I looked this draft over while preparing materials to brief the IEEE 802.11
working group on IETF activities. I reported some nits in the new text directly
to Russ, and he has acknowledged them. Outside of that, I believe the document
is ready to be sent on to the IESG.
-Peter
Reviewer: Peter Yee
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information
Joe,
I reviewed the draft and sent comments directly to Russ in the
form of a marked up Word document (which is why I didn’t previously post my
input to the list). I’ve no problems with the document advancing based on
Russ’ -01 update.
-Pe
I support adoption of this draft and am willing to review it.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Wood
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2019 1:40 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [TLS] Call for Adoption: TLS 1.3 Extension for Certificat
The current recommendations in NIST SP 800-57 Part 1, Table 2 suggest that
256-bit symmetric strength is matched by ECC strength of 512+ bits. All
of the ECC sizes given in Table 2 are slightly different than given below,
and most are given as ranges, not single values.
http://csrc.nist.gov/publi
