Re: [TLS] Packet number encryption negotiation

> A first draft can be found here: > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-pismenny-tls-dtls-plaintext-sequence-number-00.txt > > > > and the source is here: > https://github.com/BorisPis/draft-pismenny-tls-dtls-plaintext

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-ctls-07.txt

Hi, On 1/3/23 20:16, Ben Schwartz wrote: > Hi TLS, > > This is the update to cTLS that missed the draft cutoff for our last > meeting.  There are no major changes since -06 (which was presented at > IETF 114 [1]), but there are a number of minor corrections, cleanups, > and clarifications.  (Thank

Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-batch-signing

On 11/10/22 18:04, Ilari Liusvaara wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 02:29:38PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote: The above draft has expired. However, if there is still interest in it, the EdDSA specification will need to be updated based on findings in [1] and [2]. An erratum to [3] has been filed [4

[TLS] draft-ietf-tls-batch-signing

The above draft has expired. However, if there is still interest in it, the EdDSA specification will need to be updated based on findings in [1] and [2]. An erratum to [3] has been filed [4]. Libsodium seems to offer best checks for batch verification. Currently testing other libraries that of