[TLS]Re: Discussions on Trust Anchor Negotiation at IETF 120

2024-07-28 Thread Watson Ladd
I agree there have been a lot of electrons spilled. However despite that there's a lot of questions about this negotiation mechanism's impacts on browsers with lesser market share, site behavior, CA support, command line utilities (a nightmare) that haven't really been discussed and really deserves

[TLS]Re: Discussions on Trust Anchor Negotiation at IETF 120

2024-07-28 Thread Ryan Hurst
For what it is worth, agree with Sophie, trust anchor negation is needed regardless of PQC, and tying the two topics together artificially would not make either problem domain easier to solve. Ryan On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 3:28 PM Sophie Schmieg wrote: > I don't think trust anchor negotiation ne

[TLS]Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)

2024-07-28 Thread Repository Activity Summary Bot
Issues -- * tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+0/-1/💬0) 1 issues closed: - Memory for ECH rejection https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/604 Pull requests - * tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+0/-1/💬0) 1 pull requests merged: - Explain when clients can remember reject