I don't think trust anchor negotiation needs a lot more discussion, over
what has happened already. All in all, I think it's a good mechanism that
is fairly well defined and it's not clear to me how it would benefit from
an interim.
PQ TLS on the other hand has a lot of open questions about things
On 24/07/2024 12:59, Tim Hollebeek wrote:
I think this is a good summary. I want to support this sort of effort, in part
because it's very similar to some other ideas my boss and I were pushing about
five years ago. Something similar to this would solve, but also cause, lots of
problems. I
I support adoption.
Chris P.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 9:17 AM Sean Turner wrote:
> At the IETF 120 TLS session there was interest in adopting the SSLKEYLOG
> Extension file for ECH I-D (
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rosomakho-tls-ech-keylogfile/).
> This message starts a two-weekl cal
Hi Paul,
We consider the proposed change from "initial handshake” to “handshake” in this
erratum report to be above editorial, so we changed the Type to “Technical”. As
Stream Approver, please review and set the Status and Type accordingly (see the
definitions at https://www.rfc-editor.org/erra
