Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design

2022-04-30 Thread Russ Housley
> On Apr 29, 2022, at 8:24 PM, Stephen Farrell > wrote: > > On 27/04/2022 16:27, Christopher Wood wrote: >> This email commences a two week WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design, >> located here: >>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design/ > > As I guess I've said b

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design

2022-04-30 Thread Stephen Farrell
Hiya, On 30/04/2022 10:05, Ilari Liusvaara wrote: On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 01:24:58AM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote: Hiya, On 27/04/2022 16:27, Christopher Wood wrote: This email commences a two week WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design, located here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design

2022-04-30 Thread Martin Thomson
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022, at 00:24, Douglas Stebila wrote: > Thanks for the feedback Martin. I see what you're getting at regarding > phrasing it in terms of KeyGen[i], Encaps[i], etc. This is a good > point: > >>> For a hybrid key exchange, the key_exchange field of a KeyShareEntry is the >>>

Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design

2022-04-30 Thread Ilari Liusvaara
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 01:24:58AM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hiya, > > On 27/04/2022 16:27, Christopher Wood wrote: > > This email commences a two week WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design, > > located here: > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design/ >