Issues
--
* tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+0/-1/💬3)
3 issues received 3 new comments:
- #183 Clarification on repeated extensions in ESNIRecord and ESNIKeys (1 by
chris-wood)
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/183
- #145 Adopt HPKE (1 by chris-wood)
https://github.c
In article you write:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>One comment. Perhaps some caution might be advised in light of the
>antitrust court order in /Trueposition v. Ericsson/. Ref. Order in Case
>No. 2:11-cv-4574, (U.S. E.D. Pa, 14 Jul 2014).
That's a single page dismissing 3GPP from the case. Really?
https:
Among editorial changes, this update removes key schedule injection. The
resulting design still requires formal analysis, though we don’t
expect much more to change at this point. Please have a look and provide
feedback.
Thanks!
Chris (no hat)
On 7 Mar 2020, at 15:45, internet-dra...@ietf.org
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Transport Layer Security WG of the IETF.
Title : Semi-Static Diffie-Hellman Key Establishment for TLS
1.3
Authors : Eric Rescorla
Hi folks,
I have just submitted -35.
This makes the following notable changes:
- Fix contradictory text around the legacy cookie field by requiring it to
be empty.
- Note that you can't ACK records unless you are processing the contents
(as noted by Hanno).
It also fixes a few editorial problem
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Transport Layer Security WG of the IETF.
Title : The Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Protocol
Version 1.3
Authors : Eric Rescorla
One comment. Perhaps some caution might be advised in light of the
antitrust court order in /Trueposition v. Ericsson/. Ref. Order in Case
No. 2:11-cv-4574, (U.S. E.D. Pa, 14 Jul 2014).
--amr
On 2020-03-06 7:02 PM, John Mattsson wrote:
Hi,
I am happy to report that 3GPP just took the decisi
One comment. Perhaps some caution might be advised in light of the
antitrust court order in /Trueposition v. Ericsson/. Ref. Order in Case
No. 2:11-cv-4574, (U.S. E.D. Pa, 14 Jul 2014).
--amr
On 2020-03-06 7:02 PM, John Mattsson wrote:
Hi,
I am happy to report that 3GPP just took the decisi
