There will be discussions in the QUIC WG this week about connection
IDs, but here are some pointers:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1495
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1483 (might be
irrelevant, but reflective of the different design choices)
https://github.com/quicwg/b
Sorry Ted, I think I was not so clear.
We use https (http over tls) to transmit this invoice files and I think it will
be great if we have the option on the tls protocol to ask another service to
encrypt things to it, without having the certificate (with private key).
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 1:50
Why do you need to extend tls to do this? Why not just use it for
encapsulation? What you are describing sounds more like pgp than tls.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:15 PM Walter Neto
wrote:
> Hi IETF tls list,
>
> I have some problem to solve I believe it is good to make my questions and
> propo
Hi IETF tls list,
I have some problem to solve I believe it is good to make my questions and
proposals here.
I'm from Brazil, here we need to use X.509 certificates to sign electronic
invoices XMLs and to communicate this XMLs through https.
The problem is that the most of emitters pass their ce
Dear Benjamin,
See my comments below.
From: Benjamin Kaduk [bka...@akamai.com]
Sent: Sunday, 15 July, 2018 11:26:25 AM
To: Wang Haiguang
Cc:
Subject: Re: [TLS] Regarding the identity bidding issue when using raw public
key with TLS
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 a
Slides for today are uploaded to:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/tls/meetings/
spt
> On Jul 11, 2018, at 13:27, Sean Turner wrote:
>
> A revised agenda has been posted.
>
> spt
>
>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 12:15, Sean Turner wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> The agenda has been posted:
>> https://datat
On Saturday, 14 July 2018 18:59:01 CEST Yaron Sheffer wrote:
> >>> I'd encourage you to try get people to be open about
> >>> things here - there's no particular shame in having 10% TLSv1.0
> >>> sessions after all:-)
> >>
> >> It isn't a question of shame but it is just a bit too much information
