Hi Adam,
Thanks for the review. You picked up on something that was a little
sloppy there.
PR: https://github.com/tlswg/tls-record-limit/pull/19
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Adam Roach wrote:>
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
> ยง4:
>
>> MUST NOT send a value higher
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-record-limit-02: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to ht
I will trim the purely editorial stuff, as the authors should be
able to handle that (and have already started, since the cipher
suite/hash+signature algorithm thing was already noted).
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 09:56:16AM -0700, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Alexey Melnikov has entered the following bal
Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Plea
Stewart, thanks for your review. Sean, thanks for the updates. I have entered a
No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Feb 27, 2018, at 2:22 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Feb 27, 2018, at 11:21, Russ Housley wrote:
>>
>>
Minor issues:
I think convention is to list the docum
