+1 on Tony comment
- Keep this version TLS 1.3
- For the next version of TLS, drop the 1.x and call it TLS 4
Mohan Sekar
From: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tony Arcieri
Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2016 9:04 AM
To: Sean Turner
Cc:
Subject: Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus: TLS1
Tony Arcieri writes:
>There is now a huge body of work which calls the protocol "TLS 1.3"
When you say "huge body of work" you're referring to an IETF draft with "no
formal status, subject to change or removal at any time; therefore they should
not be cited or quoted in any formal document" (in
At this point I don’t think it’s December 2nd anywhere in the world, so it’s
time to close this thread. Joe and I will take a couple of days to review the
130+ messages.
spt
> On Nov 17, 2016, at 21:12, Sean Turner wrote:
>
> At IETF 97, the chairs lead a discussion to resolve whether the WG
>
> The wire format is one thing, but there is work that has been done at a
> much higher level referencing "TLS 1.3", e.g. TRON work:
>
> http://prosecco.gforge.inria.fr/personal/karthik/pubs/
> proscript-tls-tron-2016.pdf
>
Thanks for the reference but this draft paper does not count as a
publi
