>
>
> For the use cases you mentioned Keith, they seem to be specific to
> application triggered key updates, i.e. key updates do not mean anything to
> the TLS layer apart from I got a key update and I must change keys. The
> fact that other side has thrown away it's key is only meaningful to the
Why is the type editorial? According to [1], an editorial errata is "a
spelling, grammar, punctuation, or syntax error that does not affect the
technical meaning". Although the mistake in RFC4492 is clearly a typo, I think
it does affect the technical meaning. So I would prefer to leave the type
This looks correct, but I’d change the “type” to editorial. Unless anybody
disagrees with by next Monday, I’ll ask Stephen to accept this.
I’ve also submitted an issue in the 4492bis github repo to get this fixed in
the new draft. I’d submit a PR, but I’m still digging out from being absent
l
For people that currently use keyupdates or who are planning to use key
updates, which layer are you planning to trigger a key update? Would the TLS
implementation itself trigger the update or would the application trigger it?
For renegotation, I believe it was mostly triggered by the applicatio
