The interesting thing is that, in some contests like CQWW this works, in
some not. If it works the number is printed with 4 digits.
73 Fred
On 09/10/2012 01:19 AM, Martin Kratoska wrote:
The September CWopen by CWops discovered following bugs in tlf-1.2.0_pre2:
Another bug - if defining the
Hi Fred,
although I cannot find it (now) in the source code, I suspect the intial
work of Rein, PA0R, which included some "hardwired" contests. If tlf
should have any future, it must be cleaned from the remnants of
hardwired contests, also it must be freely configurable.
The mess can be trac
Datum: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:43:39 +0200
Von: Thomas Beierlein
An: ad...@ok1rr.com
Betreff: Re: bugs in tlf-1.2.0_pre2
Hi Martin,
thanks for the report.
Am Mon, 10 Sep 2012 03:19:10 +0200
schrieb Martin Kratoska :
> The September CWopen by CWops discovered following bugs in
> tlf-1.2.0_pre2:
>
Hi Martin, hi Fred,
Am Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:44:41 +0200
schrieb Martin Kratoska :
> Hi Fred,
>
> although I cannot find it (now) in the source code, I suspect the
> intial work of Rein, PA0R, which included some "hardwired" contests.
You are quite right. Nearly all contest logic in TLF is hardwi
Hey all;
If you want some ideas on how to do the various things listed below
(including the rig freq. input, flexible cabrillo output defined from
without the in-line program code, point and mult. definition from
without the subroutines, and etc), you can check out another open
source logging
Hi Bob,
Am Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:35:23 -0600
schrieb w9ya :
> If you want some ideas on how to do the various things listed below
> (including the rig freq. input, flexible cabrillo output defined from
> without the in-line program code, point and mult. definition from
> without the subroutines, and
Hey again !;
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> Am Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:35:23 -0600
> schrieb w9ya :
>> If you want some ideas on how to do the various things listed below
>> (including the rig freq. input, flexible cabrillo output defined from
>> without the i
