Re: TLF 1.5~git - BUG in FOC Marathon

2023-02-15 Thread Thomas Beierlein
Hi Martin, just found time to check your observations. I can not confirm your problems. Can you please double check that you downloaded and installed the code from the link below? https://github.com/dl1jbe/tlf/tree/fix_focm The main repo still contains the bug. I just just did some tes

Re: TLF 1.5~git - BUG in FOC Marathon

2023-02-06 Thread Thomas Beierlein
Problem found. Due to a missing width for the exchange field the former entries got ignored after restart. You can test the corrected code from https://github.com/dl1jbe/tlf/tree/fix_focm I set the input field width to 5 characters max. If there is more room needed please say so. 73, de Tom DL1

Re: TLF 1.5~git - BUG in FOC Marathon

2023-02-04 Thread Thomas Beierlein
Thanks for the report. We will look into it. Checking my old test logs from 2014 the old log file is correct. So it seems something happened in meantime. 73, de Tom DL1JBE Am Fri, 3 Feb 2023 10:51:12 +0100 schrieb Martin Kratoska : > Just before the event I found a bad bug - when I leave the pr

TLF 1.5~git - BUG in FOC Marathon

2023-02-03 Thread Martin Kratoska
Just before the event I found a bad bug - when I leave the program and start it again, the exchange (FOC number) disappears. It is also not in the resulting ADIF file, not in the log file. The log file looks so: 40CW 03-Feb-23 09:39 0001 DJ5CW 599 599 1 7030.0 20CW 03-Fe