Hi Nate,
I just pushed a cleanup to the code in the morning which made the
abs functionality explicit. Please see the code at github for reference.
Working with different compiler switches looks not so good from my
point of view. Better do a clean (and maybe a little bit dumb) coding
instead. If
* On 2018 08 Nov 00:56 -0600, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
> Hi Nate,
>
> thanks for checking with clang.
It's just one of the janitorial things I do on occasion. ;-)
> I fear just removing the abs would silence the compiler warning but
> will violate the idea behind the expression. Frequencies are
Hi Nate,
thanks for checking with clang.
Am Tue, 6 Nov 2018 04:38:29 -0600
schrieb Nate Bargmann :
> I occasionally go through the projects and test with clang as it will
> often catch things GCC is silent on. I've been doing so with clang6
> and Hamlib and did the same with Tlf. I can report
