Re: Cabrillo format

2023-01-30 Thread Marcin SP6MI
Hi, oh.. yes I use :WRIte command. And looks that my fault. I have to somehow miss that file. Thanks for help Br Marcin Wysłano z bezpiecznej poczty e-mail Proton Mail. --- Original Message --- poniedziałek, 30 stycznia 2023 09:42, Csahok Zoltan napisał(a): > Hi Marcin, > > How d

Re: Cabrillo format

2023-01-30 Thread Csahok Zoltan
Hi Marcin, How did you export the log to Cabrillo? Normally it is done by entering :WRI in the call input field. The file you got is just TLF's internal log file. So either the export was done differently or you are looking at the wrong file. The exported Cabrillo file is called .cbr. 73, Zoli

Cabrillo format

2023-01-29 Thread Marcin SP6MI
Hi, Yesterday I've exported log from small general contest to carbillo format, and looks like it's not valid with standard. Order of fields is different, date has wrong format. Where I can define format of cabrillo file (if it's possible). I got: 80SSB 29-Jan-23 18:00 001 3Z3AHK 59 59 2 3727.0

Re: [tlf-devel] TLF and Cabrillo format

2008-10-03 Thread Piotr Tomczak
Hi, I made a small modification in the section mentioned in my previouse mail and it seems to generate the cabrillo file correctly, at least for WPX and other contests that use a serial number exchange. Some of you may think that it was not necessary, but right should be right. Maybe we can add it

Re: [tlf-devel] TLF and Cabrillo format

2008-10-02 Thread Piotr Tomczak
WIW, I have submitted close to 50 TLF-generated Cabrillo files for various > contests and none have been rejected, so the processing software must not do > a strict check on format. > > Bob, N7XY > > > On Oct 2, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Piotr Tomczak wrote: > > Hello again Ed. >

Re: [tlf-devel] TLF and Cabrillo format

2008-10-02 Thread Bob Nielsen
cabrillo format at SAC and it seems that I was rigth the format has wrong position for RCVD Call Sign. It does not matter that it generates the ADIF or that my Converter program handle the format anyway, after I made some modifications in parsing the QSO line. But the problem is still there and

Re: [tlf-devel] TLF and Cabrillo format

2008-10-02 Thread Piotr Tomczak
Hello again Ed. I checked with the rules and cabrillo format at SAC and it seems that I was rigth the format has wrong position for RCVD Call Sign. It does not matter that it generates the ADIF or that my Converter program handle the format anyway, after I made some modifications in parsing the

Re: [tlf-devel] TLF and Cabrillo format

2008-09-29 Thread Piotr Tomczak
My fault Ed... 1. I did miss the possibility of ADIF generation from TLF 2. I have tested different Cabrillo to ADIF converters, and this resulted in writing my own converter that handle both the TLF Cabrillo format and the propper Cabrillo format. Anyway when I have looked at the writecabrillo.c

Re: [tlf-devel] TLF and Cabrillo format

2008-09-29 Thread Ed
Piotr Tomczak wrote: Hi friends... I have discovered lately that there is some small missmatch in the Cabrillo file generated with TLF compared to both the standard and the other log programs. The difference is in the QSO data. In the received info CALL field. In the Cabrillo specification the se

[tlf-devel] TLF and Cabrillo format

2008-09-29 Thread Piotr Tomczak
Hi friends... I have discovered lately that there is some small missmatch in the Cabrillo file generated with TLF compared to both the standard and the other log programs. The difference is in the QSO data. In the received info CALL field. In the Cabrillo specification the second CALL field starts