Hi,
oh.. yes I use :WRIte command. And looks that my fault. I have to somehow miss
that file. Thanks for help
Br
Marcin
Wysłano z bezpiecznej poczty e-mail Proton Mail.
--- Original Message ---
poniedziałek, 30 stycznia 2023 09:42, Csahok Zoltan napisał(a):
> Hi Marcin,
>
> How d
Hi Marcin,
How did you export the log to Cabrillo?
Normally it is done by entering
:WRI
in the call input field.
The file you got is just TLF's internal log file. So either the export was done
differently or you are looking at the wrong file.
The exported Cabrillo file is called .cbr.
73,
Zoli
Hi,
Yesterday I've exported log from small general contest to carbillo format, and
looks like it's not valid with standard. Order of fields is different, date has
wrong format. Where I can define format of cabrillo file (if it's possible).
I got:
80SSB 29-Jan-23 18:00 001 3Z3AHK 59 59 2 3727.0
Hi,
I made a small modification in the section mentioned in my previouse mail
and it seems to generate the cabrillo file correctly, at least for WPX and
other contests that use a serial number exchange.
Some of you may think that it was not necessary, but right should be right.
Maybe we can add it
WIW, I have submitted close to 50 TLF-generated Cabrillo files for various
> contests and none have been rejected, so the processing software must not do
> a strict check on format.
>
> Bob, N7XY
>
>
> On Oct 2, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Piotr Tomczak wrote:
>
> Hello again Ed.
>
cabrillo format at SAC and it seems
that I was rigth the format has wrong position for RCVD Call Sign.
It does not matter that it generates the ADIF or that my Converter
program handle the format anyway, after I made some modifications
in parsing the QSO line.
But the problem is still there and
Hello again Ed.
I checked with the rules and cabrillo format at SAC and it seems that I was
rigth the format has wrong position for RCVD Call Sign.
It does not matter that it generates the ADIF or that my Converter program
handle the format anyway, after I made some modifications in parsing the
My fault Ed...
1. I did miss the possibility of ADIF generation from TLF
2. I have tested different Cabrillo to ADIF converters, and this resulted in
writing my own converter that handle both the TLF Cabrillo format and the
propper Cabrillo format.
Anyway when I have looked at the writecabrillo.c
Piotr Tomczak wrote:
Hi friends...
I have discovered lately that there is some small missmatch in the Cabrillo
file generated with TLF compared to both the standard and the other log
programs.
The difference is in the QSO data.
In the received info CALL field. In the Cabrillo specification the se
Hi friends...
I have discovered lately that there is some small missmatch in the Cabrillo
file generated with TLF compared to both the standard and the other log
programs.
The difference is in the QSO data.
In the received info CALL field. In the Cabrillo specification the second
CALL field starts
10 matches
Mail list logo