Hi,
I made a small modification in the section mentioned in my previouse mail
and it seems to generate the cabrillo file correctly, at least for WPX and
other contests that use a serial number exchange.
Some of you may think that it was not necessary, but right should be right.
Maybe we can add it
Yes it may be so.
I have been working in WPX and it was all OK, As far as I know the logs has
not been rejected.
Anyway, the format is not correct. The size of given exchange should be
wider by 2 characters.
I suspect that the problem is here: See the comments in bold
else if ((w
FWIW, I have submitted close to 50 TLF-generated Cabrillo files for
various contests and none have been rejected, so the processing
software must not do a strict check on format.
Bob, N7XY
On Oct 2, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Piotr Tomczak wrote:
Hello again Ed.
I checked with the rules and cabri
Hello again Ed.
I checked with the rules and cabrillo format at SAC and it seems that I was
rigth the format has wrong position for RCVD Call Sign.
It does not matter that it generates the ADIF or that my Converter program
handle the format anyway, after I made some modifications in parsing the Q
My fault Ed...
1. I did miss the possibility of ADIF generation from TLF
2. I have tested different Cabrillo to ADIF converters, and this resulted in
writing my own converter that handle both the TLF Cabrillo format and the
propper Cabrillo format.
Anyway when I have looked at the writecabrillo.c
Piotr Tomczak wrote:
Hi friends...
I have discovered lately that there is some small missmatch in the Cabrillo
file generated with TLF compared to both the standard and the other log
programs.
The difference is in the QSO data.
In the received info CALL field. In the Cabrillo specification the se
Hi friends...
I have discovered lately that there is some small missmatch in the Cabrillo
file generated with TLF compared to both the standard and the other log
programs.
The difference is in the QSO data.
In the received info CALL field. In the Cabrillo specification the second
CALL field starts
