Re: [Tlf-devel] CQ 160m rules, anyone written one?

2016-01-29 Thread Nate Bargmann
* On 2016 29 Jan 12:02 -0600, Mike Waters wrote: > Thanks, Nate! I have an older version of tlf (not sure how to determine the > version) perhaps 3 years old. Any chance this rules file won't work? Hi Mike. There is always a chance, of course. Admittedly, I don't know as it would depend on when

Re: [Tlf-devel] CQ 160m rules, anyone written one?

2016-01-29 Thread Mike Waters
Thanks! Version: tlf-1.2.0_pre4 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Am Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:01:23 -0600 > schrieb Mike Waters : > > > Thanks, Nate! I have an older version of tlf (not sure how to > > determine the version) > > it quite

Re: [Tlf-devel] CQ 160m rules, anyone written one?

2016-01-29 Thread Thomas Beierlein
Hi Mike, Am Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:01:23 -0600 schrieb Mike Waters : > Thanks, Nate! I have an older version of tlf (not sure how to > determine the version) it quite easy. Just run 'tlf -V'. It will tell you who it is. 73, de Tom > perhaps 3 years old. Any chance this rules > file won't work?

Re: [Tlf-devel] CQ 160m rules, anyone written one?

2016-01-29 Thread Mike Waters
Thanks, Nate! I have an older version of tlf (not sure how to determine the version) perhaps 3 years old. Any chance this rules file won't work? Thanks, Mike www.w0btu.com On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Nate Bargmann wrote: > It looks like this rules file will do the job for me in the upcomin