Re: [Tlf-devel] Re: TLF & gMFSK % other things...

2006-02-18 Thread Joop Stakenborg
Op vr, 17-02-2006 te 17:01 -0500, schreef Ed: > Joop Stakenborg wrote: > > > Have you tried gmfsk plus xlog for contesting? > > Joop, PG4I > > > I was not aware that it was possible to do this. I thought Xlog was only > capable of CW contesting. 73 > Yes, but since gmfsk can send data to xl

Re: [Tlf-devel] Re: TLF & gMFSK % other things...

2006-02-18 Thread Bob Nielsen
One nice benefit of getting TLF to ___ Tlf-devel mailing list Tlf-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tlf-devel

Re: [Tlf-devel] Re: TLF & gMFSK % other things...

2006-02-18 Thread Piotr Tomczak
Hej... Right now I have an ARRL contest, but next week I will try to look for the source files to the TLF and maybe I can help with the changes, if you do not mind. Maybe there are some other needs or ideas regarding the TLF form other users. Some ideas about the QSO mode (I use it a lot): 1.

Re: [Tlf-devel] Re: TLF & gMFSK % other things...

2006-02-18 Thread Piotr Tomczak
Just short message since the ARRL CW contest has started: By adding the "CHANGE_RST" in the logcfg.dat the changing of the RST works fine. As described in the Documentation. Just looked at the parse_logcfg.c and into the man pages... 73 Piotr SM7yea > Tlf needs some attention anyway.Piotr want t

Re: [Tlf-devel] Re: TLF & gMFSK % other things...

2006-02-18 Thread Ed
Joop Stakenborg wrote: Have you tried gmfsk plus xlog for contesting? Joop, PG4I I was not aware that it was possible to do this. I thought Xlog was only capable of CW contesting. 73 Ed W3NR ___ Tlf-devel mailing list Tlf-devel@nongnu.org http