Dear all,
I just want to point out this website which is nicely done:
https://typora.io
Maybe it could give us some inspiration for our own.
Best
Max
___
Texmacs-dev mailing list
Texmacs-dev@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs
Hi Max,
I know that you like this kind of design,
but I must admit that I find it fairly common and
somewhat too minimalistic.
Best wishes, --Joris
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 01:00:55PM +0200, Massimiliano Gubinelli wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I just want to point out this website which is nicely d
I like it. However, it looks inaccessible to us unless we had a full-time
graphic designer working for us (?)
Basile
> Le 21 mai 2021 à 17:17, TeXmacs a écrit :
>
> Hi Max,
>
> I know that you like this kind of design,
> but I must admit that I find it fairly common and
> somewhat too minimali
Dear TeXmacs-devel,
I am running TeXmacs-1.99.20 under MacOS 11.3 (Big Sur).
This is the binary that I downloaded from texmacs.org.
A colleague is running the *same binary* also on Big Sur
and he can go to Insert -> Fold -> Executable -> Tikz.
I can go to Insert -> Fold -> Executable and get a
Hi Daniel,
Tikz is not part of TeXmacs, so the way it work depends
on your environment and in particular on the particular
LaTeX distribution that you are using. If your colleague
has 'Insert -> Fold -> Executable -> Tikz', contrary to you,
then this probably means that the 'latex' binary is some
> Tikz is not part of TeXmacs, so the way it work depends
> on your environment and in particular on the particular
> LaTeX distribution that you are using. If your colleague
> has 'Insert -> Fold -> Executable -> Tikz', contrary to you,
> then this probably means that the 'latex' binary is someh
That seems strange indeed. Also because if XYpic works then both python and
latex should be visible from TeXmacs.
You can also try to run
(url-exists-in-path? "latex")
in a scheme session. It should return #t to signify that latex is indeed
visible from TeXmacs.
Note also that you can have ac
You might also want to check the output to
(python-command)
and of
(tikz-launcher)
in a scheme session.
> On 21. May 2021, at 22:41, Massimiliano Gubinelli
> wrote:
>
> That seems strange indeed. Also because if XYpic works then both python and
> latex should be visible from TeXmacs.
>
Massimiliano Gubinelli wrote:
> You might also want to check the output to
> (python-command)
> and of
> (tikz-launcher)
> in a scheme session.
Scheme] (url-exists-in-path? "latex")
#t
Scheme] (python-command)
"python3"
Scheme] (tikz-launcher)
"python3
\"/Applications/TeXmacs.app/Content
Dear Joris and Massimiliano,
Thanks for your help. The Insert -> Fold -> Executable -> Tikz menu
item is now working.
As I reported in my last message, I changed the permission of
/Applications/TeXmacs.app/Contents/Resources/share/TeXmacs/plugins/tmpy/session/tm_tikz.py
to 755.
That didn't do i
Potentially helpful is also executing all of the commands in the
init-tikz.scm file in a Scheme session. If something fails you will get
an error message in the document. I am assuming that the Fold Executable
is available if and only if the plugin initialization succeeds.
Am 21.05.2021 um 2
I posted this before seeing the message where you say that the menu is
now working :-)
G.
Am 22.05.2021 um 01:02 schrieb Giovanni Piredda:
Potentially helpful is also executing all of the commands in the
init-tikz.scm file in a Scheme session. If something fails you will
get an error messag
> Potentially helpful is also executing all of the commands in the
> init-tikz.scm file in a Scheme session. If something fails you will get
> an error message in the document. I am assuming that the Fold Executable
> is available if and only if the plugin initialization succeeds.
Thanks, that
13 matches
Mail list logo
