Hi Joris, Hi all,
wrt. to the reply below: is not known to TeXmacs whether we are in LaTeX math
mode or not? We should be able to precompute this and avoid \ensuremath all the
way (apart from macro definitions). Or there are some issues there?
Best
Max
ps: I've moved the discussion to texmacs
Hi Max,
Yes, we can decide in most cases. But LaTeX is hairy, as always,
and not very robust. We don't want the LaTeX compilation to fail
in 1% of the cases in which something may have gone wrong.
Best wishes, --Joris
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:26:24AM +0200, Massimiliano Gubinelli wrote:
> H
I haven't been able to build it ( ;-) ), maybe I have chosen a wrong
method, with MinGW---the one in
http://mingw.osdn.io/index.html?page=about.html I think, but I do not
recall; not this: http://mingw-w64.org/doku.php
For the records, I got blocked by undefined references to library
function
Am 12.05.2021 um 01:02 schrieb Giovanni Piredda:
As a partial compensation, I have found out that there is a tree for
the compilation with mingw (I assume the "w64" one):
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/tree/?h=mingw-guile-3.0
It has commits in March 2021. Maybe it helps; this t
