Re: [Texmacs-dev] working around arXiv' overshoot

2021-11-22 Thread Giovanni Piredda
Or a less annoying and aggressive way, which I still need to find ;-) G. On 22.11.21 18:06, Giovanni Piredda wrote: I suggest that anyone whose paper written with TeXmacs does not go through the ArXiv checks writes to the ArXiv help mailbox mentioning the pull request : telling that the check,

Re: [Texmacs-dev] working around arXiv' overshoot

2021-11-22 Thread Giovanni Piredda
I suggest that anyone whose paper written with TeXmacs does not go through the ArXiv checks writes to the ArXiv help mailbox mentioning the pull request : telling that the check, which is supposed to not filter out TeXmacs-written papers, needs to be updated and that the pull request fixes this

Re: [Texmacs-dev] working around arXiv' overshoot

2021-11-20 Thread TeXmacs
Hi Jeroen, Thanks, great; please send us feedback whenever you have news about your pull request. Best wishes, --Joris On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 10:44:34PM +, Jeroen Wouters wrote: > Hello Joris, > > It seems that someone at arXiv actually used one of your papers to test > their expressions

Re: [Texmacs-dev] working around arXiv' overshoot

2021-11-20 Thread Jeroen Wouters
Hello Joris, It seems that someone at arXiv actually used one of your papers to test their expressions on: https://github.com/arXiv/arxiv-submission-core/blob/ARXIVNG-2885/core/arxiv/submission/process/checks/test_files_tex_produced/sparsemult6.pdf That specific paper was written in TeXmacs 1.0.7

Re: [Texmacs-dev] working around arXiv' overshoot

2021-11-20 Thread TeXmacs
Thanks Jeroen, for finding this useful information. So with the 1.* versions, ArXiv actually did accept TeXmacs, lately? Maybe the person(s) who recontact ArXiv could just suggest to change the regular expression into regex3 = re.compile(br"^(Creator|Producer).*TeX(?!(t|macs-))",re.IGNORECASE

Re: [Texmacs-dev] working around arXiv' overshoot

2021-11-20 Thread Frank
Hello, Did you use your institute email address to report the issue to arXiv, including the submission number? They somehow say that once we encountered an issue, we should give them the submission number. I will have a try to write them an email from my side, but unfortunately, I don't have a

Re: [Texmacs-dev] working around arXiv' overshoot

2021-11-20 Thread Frank
As proposed by Joris, I write to the dev channel instead of the user channel. I have just find this https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/417318/arxiv-how-it-detects-tex-generated-pdfs-even-if-metadata-changed#comment1044390_417450 which indicates that they (note that this user is an administ

Re: [Texmacs-dev] working around arXiv' overshoot

2021-11-20 Thread Jeroen Wouters
Dear all, It seems that at least some of the code on Github is, in fact, in use. Specifically, there's the following regular expression [1]: regex3 = re.compile(br"^(Creator|Producer).*TeX(?!(t|macs-1\.))", re.IGNORECASE) This excludes strings like "TeXmacs-1.xx.xx". I've tested this on the