Hi Joris,
> On 18. May 2021, at 11:43, TeXmacs wrote:
>
> Hi Max,
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:02:12AM +0200, Massimiliano Gubinelli wrote:
>>> The question is whether TeXmacs would really be in its role here.
>>> This could be considered to be the job of plug-ins.
>>
>> It could. But then t
Hi Max,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:02:12AM +0200, Massimiliano Gubinelli wrote:
> > The question is whether TeXmacs would really be in its role here.
> > This could be considered to be the job of plug-ins.
>
> It could. But then the question become if we want to provide a unified
> mechanism to
Hi Joris,
> On 17. May 2021, at 18:06, TeXmacs wrote:
>
> Hi Max,
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:33:07AM +0200, Massimiliano Gubinelli wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> in the forum there is a question about a more friendly interface to the plot
>> editor ("!" in the graph more). Currently one can define
Hi Max,
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:33:07AM +0200, Massimiliano Gubinelli wrote:
> Dear all,
> in the forum there is a question about a more friendly interface to the plot
> editor ("!" in the graph more). Currently one can define functions but only
> in scheme syntax which is not very user-frie
