Sebastian Miele writes:
> [..] See, e.g., [3], [..]
>
> [1]
> https://www.fsf.org/blogs/sysadmin/coming-soon-a-new-site-for-fully-free-collaboration
> [2] https://libreplanet.org/wiki/FSF_2020_forge_evaluation
[3] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2020-11/msg01013.html
__
Massimiliano Gubinelli writes:
>
> > On 19. May 2021, at 23:00, Giovanni Piredda wrote:
> >
> > Am 19.05.2021 um 10:58 schrieb Massimiliano Gubinelli:
> > > it adds some background to our discussion of moving some of the
> > > development of TeXmacs to a git-based workflow, possibly on github.
>
> On 19. May 2021, at 23:00, Giovanni Piredda wrote:
>
>
> Am 19.05.2021 um 10:58 schrieb Massimiliano Gubinelli:
>> it adds some background to our discussion of moving some of the development
>> of TeXmacs to a git-based workflow, possibly on github.
>>
>> Max
>
> The development of free s
Am 19.05.2021 um 10:58 schrieb Massimiliano Gubinelli:
it adds some background to our discussion of moving some of the development of
TeXmacs to a git-based workflow, possibly on github.
Max
The development of free software on github leaves me uneasy.
I see the draw that the platform has on
Hi Massimiliano,
Massimiliano Gubinelli writes:
>
> [..]
>
> I would like to hear possible defects of git which are relevant to our
> situation.
none that I know of.
Best wishes
Sebastian
___
Texmacs-dev mailing list
Texmacs-dev@gnu.org
https://lists
Dear Sebastian,
thanks for the pointer, I was not aware of this. I know Darcs and I'm very much
interested in a principled theory of patches and Rust programming.
It is not clear what advantages Darcs or any other alternative version control
system will bring to us as a whole.
I think for a p
Hi Massimiliano,
Massimiliano Gubinelli writes:
> I've just found the following blog post on OCAML development which in
> part discuss the effect of their transition to github:
>
> https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/analyzing-contributions-to-the-ocaml-compiler-and-all-opam-packages/7854
>
> it adds som
