l/web2c/texmfcnf.lua'
resolvers | resolving | unknown configuration file
'./texmf/web2c/texmfcnf.lua'
resolvers | resolving |
resolvers | resolving | warning: no lua configuration files found
resolvers | resolving | no texmf paths are defined
aths that ConTeXt checks for
texmfcnf.lua. If that list doesn't suffice, ConTeXt may be patched
(and you will get instructions how to do so for the released version),
but you need to tell us where this file is usually located first."
Can anything be done?
Regards,
Vedran Miletić
P.S.
texli
Hi Jindrich,
this is still an issue. Can I help in fixing it?
Vedran Miletić
Datuma 7. srpnja 2011. 19:33 Vedran Miletić je napisao/la:
> Hi,
>
> as opposed to TeX Live 2011 pretest installed by install-tl, ConTeXt
> installed from RPMs doesn't work, i.e. mtxrun --generate a
Yeah, I sent a mail later as well, but Jindrich didn't reply.
I was optimistic that he will reply now because he replied to another
thread recently, but we will see.
I have got nothing to lose.
Vedran
Datuma 9. prosinca 2011. 12:16 Mojca Miklavec
je napisao/la:
> 2011/12/9 Vedran
2011/12/12 Jindrich Novy :
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 12:16:46PM +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> 2011/12/9 Vedran Miletić wrote:
>> > Hi Jindrich,
>> >
>> > this is still an issue. Can I help in fixing it?
>
> Sure I'm open to any ConTeX improvemen
2011/12/14 Mojca Miklavec :
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 07:08, Jindrich Novy wrote:
>> It doesn't work. The mtxrun --generate is ran in %posttrans after
>> every package is installed (and /usr/bin/mtxrun exists).
>>
>> The resolvers.luacnfspec line in mtxrun is:
>>
>> resolvers.luacnfspec =
>> '/usr
Datuma 2. siječnja 2012. 14:33 Jindrich Novy je napisao/la:
> Hi Vedran,
>
> On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 02:27:50PM +0100, Vedran Miletić wrote:
>> any progress on this?
>
> Yes. ConTeXt seems to work now. I did not succeed to make mtxrun work
> by replacing paths in the
Datuma 2. siječnja 2012. 14:41 Vedran Miletić je napisao/la:
> Datuma 2. siječnja 2012. 14:33 Jindrich Novy je napisao/la:
>> Hi Vedran,
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 02:27:50PM +0100, Vedran Miletić wrote:
>>> any progress on this?
>>
>> Yes. ConTeXt se
Hi,
texlive-mathabx misses dependency on texlive-mathabx-type1. Is that intended?
Vedran
___
TeXLive mailing list
TeXLive@linux.cz
http://www.linux.cz/mailman/listinfo/texlive
2012/3/8 Mojca Miklavec :
> But please don't make a final TL2012 release for Fedora before TL2012
> is finalized. Else users will be confused. OK, LaTeX users who use old
> styles will hardly ever care or notice any difference and those who
> want to be on the bleeding edge install their own versio
8. ožujka 2012. 22:41 korisnik Tom Callaway napisao je:
> There are two remaining non-free items to be resolved first (euro-ce and
> fnpara). Progress has been made on both.
>
> ~tom
But regardless it's Fedora 18 earliest?
Vedran
___
TeXLive mailing li
If I were you, I would do
# yum erase texlive*
and reinstall everything after installing new texlive-release.
Regards,
Vedran
2012/7/19 Neal Becker :
> I have a machine that was updated from f16/tl2011 to f17. I'm now trying to
> fix it to sync with tl2012.
>
> It's a full install of tl2012 a
12 matches
Mail list logo
