I'm starting to run into issues with the rather old texlive in Fedora
and I was just wondering how the license review was going. The last
summary appears to have been in December:
http://www.linux.cz/pipermail/texlive/2011-December/000344.html
And in that, I see four things which were indicated t
> "RJ" == Roderick Johnstone writes:
RJ> What is the plan for tex-live 2012 in Fedora 18?
A quick check shows that it's checked into the f18 branch in git, but
koji shows that no build has yet succeeded.
- J<
___
TeXLive mailing list
TeXLive@linu
> "TC" == Tom Callaway writes:
TC> You'll need the package that provides the missing fonts (log shows
TC> it is eusm10). Since we know TeX fonts are either in .tfm or .pfb
TC> format, you can simply install the package that has that tex
TC> Provide:
Except that I think there's a bug in all e
> "MS" == Matthew Saltzman writes:
MS> Is there no Fedora package for this LaTeX package?
Given its license, I could understand why not. I haven't checked the
full license audit results but even if it was included it would almost
certainly have to be under another name.
- J<
_
> "MC" == Matěj Cepl writes:
MC> Now, the question is how to build just one subpackage (or any
MC> required other subpackages) from the monstrosity which the current
MC> texlive? Anybody any suggestions?
Just package it separately. They should all have proper upstream
tarballs, and there's
