Hi Mojca,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 03:36:39PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A user testing TeX Live 2011 on Fedora asked me if I could help to
> make sure that ConTeXt would work properly. Apparently it doesn't work
> as intended at the moment.
it is likely as I don't personally use C
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:42, Jindrich Novy wrote:
>
> Is there any reason why ConTeXt doesn't use kpathsea to figure out
> these paths?
The developer doesn't like kpathsea (speed limitations etc.) so he
basically rewrote the whole functionality from scratch.
> Attaching texmf.cnf from TeX Live
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:53:01PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:42, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> >
> > Is there any reason why ConTeXt doesn't use kpathsea to figure out
> > these paths?
>
> The developer doesn't like kpathsea (speed limitations etc.) so he
> basically rewro
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 13:47, Jindrich Novy wrote:
>
>> Not everything yet. Where do you have texmflocal? You seem to use an
>> almost unmodified version of texmf.cnf which refers to
>> TEXMFLOCAL = $TEXMFROOT/../texmf-local
>> but I doubt that you really use /usr/share/texmf-local for local a
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 02:02:42PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 13:47, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> In my opinion this should be fixed. You don't need to populate
> texmflocal, but you should at least support creating one.
There is no problem to add a new directory to the main
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 14:32, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 02:02:42PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 13:47, Jindrich Novy wrote:
>> In my opinion this should be fixed. You don't need to populate
>> texmflocal, but you should at least support creating one
